Short-term catheter management options for urinary retention following pelvic surgery: a cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared short-term catheterization approaches and have demonstrated no difference in patient satisfaction, but no study has evaluated their costs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the costs of 3 pathways for short-term catheter management in patients diagnosed with urinary retention following pelvic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: We utilized a Markov decision tree to model costs from the society's perspective. In pathway 1, patients have an indwelling catheter and return to the office for a voiding trial. In pathway 2, patients have an indwelling catheter and discontinue the catheters at home. In pathway 3, patients are taught clean intermittent catheterization postoperatively. We accounted for office visits, emergency department visits, urinary tract infection testing and treatment, transportation, caregiver time, teaching time, and supplies. RESULTS: Clean intermittent catheterization is the least costly catheterization method at $79 per patient, followed by self-removal of the catheter ($128) and office voiding trial ($185). One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the distance between the patient and office and the rates of spontaneous voiding following catheterization had the greatest impact. When patients need to travel >5 miles to the office for catheter removal, self-removal of a catheter is less costly than an office voiding trial. Once it has been determined that patients have urinary retention and require catheterization, clean intermittent catheterization is the most cost-saving option only if the patients are taught clean intermittent catheterization postoperatively. If all patients were to be taught clean intermittent catheterization routinely before surgery, it becomes the most costly option. Based on annual surgical volume, if even $30 were saved per patient with postoperative urinary retention, the estimated total societal savings would be $420,000 to $7.2 million. CONCLUSION: Clean intermittent catheterization as initial management of urinary retention following pelvic surgery is the most cost-saving option when it is only taught postoperatively to patients after determining the need for catheterization. When this is not possible, self-removal of an indwelling catheter is the most cost-saving option, especially as the distance between the patient and provider increases. Choosing the optimal management guided by patient and provider factors can lead to substantial cost savings annually in the United States.

The burden of illness in initiating intermittent catheterization: an analysis of German health care claims data.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent catheterization (IC) is a common medical technique to drain urine from the bladder when this is no longer possible by natural means. The objective of this study was to evaluate the standard of care and the burden of illness in German individuals who perform intermittent catheterization and obtain recommendations for improvement of care. METHODS: A descriptive study with a retrospective, longitudinal cohort design was conducted using the InGef research database from the German statutory health insurance claims data system. The study consisted of individuals with initial IC use in 2013-2015. RESULTS: Within 3 years 1100 individuals with initial IC were identified in the database (~ 19,000 in the German population). The most common IC indications were urologic diseases, spinal cord injury, Multiple Sclerosis and Spina Bifida. Urinary tract infections (UTI) were the most frequent complication occurring 1 year before index (61%) and in follow-up (year 1 60%; year 2 50%). Resource use in pre-index including hospitalizations (65%), length of stay (12.8 ± 20.0 days), physician visits (general practitioner: 15.2 ± 29.1), prescriptions of antibiotics (71%) and healthcare costs (€17,950) were high. Comorbidities, complications, and healthcare resource use were highest 1 year before index, decreasing from first to second year after index. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrated that prior to initial catheterization, IC users experienced UTIs and high healthcare utilization. While this demonstrates a potential high burden of illness prior to initial IC, UTIs also decreased over time, suggesting that IC use may have a positive influence. The findings also showed that after the first year of initial catheterization the cost decreased. Further studies are needed to better understand the extent of the burden for IC users compared to non-IC users.

Long-term compliance with bladder management in patients with spinal cord injury: A Saudi-Arabian perspective.

Objective: To examine long-term compliance with bladder management in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) at a tertiary care rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia.Design: Cross-sectional survey.Setting: Tertiary care rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia.Participants: A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to patients with SCI during their clinic visits. 50 patients (41 males and nine females) participated in the survey. Data documentation included demographic characteristics, type and level of injury, compliance with bladder management and barriers in compliance.Main outcome measures: The type of bladder management employed at first follow-up visit was compared with that employed at discharge.Results: Eleven out of 41 patients who were discharged on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) stopped it within 3 months of discharge, mainly due to lack of accessibility and financial support to buy catheters. Of the total sample, 23% reported that they did not know the difference between catheter types and their advantages, and 49% stated that they did not receive proper health education regarding bladder management.Conclusion: CIC was the most commonly used bladder management technique in patients with SCI following up at a tertiary care rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia. Compliance with CIC may be improved by ensuring access to catheters post-discharge and by providing appropriate education about bladder management during inpatient rehabilitation.

Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.

OBJECTIVES: This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing hydrophilic coated to uncoated catheters for patients performing urinary intermittent catheterisation. A national budget impact analysis is also included to evaluate the impact of intermittent catheterisation for management of bladder dysfunctions over a period of 5 years. DESIGN: A Markov model (lifetime horizon, 1 year cycle length) was developed to project health outcomes (life years and quality-adjusted life years) and economic consequences related to patients using hydrophilic coated or uncoated catheters. The model was populated with catheter-related clinical efficacy data retrieved from randomised controlled trials and quality-of-life data (utility weights) from the literature. Cost data (EUR, 2015) were estimated on the basis of healthcare resource consumption derived from an e-survey addressed to key opinion leaders in the field. SETTING: Italian Healthcare Service perspective. POPULATION: Patients with spinal cord injury performing intermittent urinary catheterisation in the home setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incremental cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (ICER and ICUR) of hydrophilic coated versus uncoated catheters and associated healthcare budget impact. RESULTS: The base-case ICER and ICUR associated with hydrophilic coated catheters were €20 761 and €24 405, respectively. This implies that hydrophilic coated catheters are likely to be cost-effective in comparison to uncoated ones, as proposed Italian threshold values range between €25 000 and €66 400. Considering a market share at year 5 of 89% hydrophilic catheters and 11% uncoated catheters, the additional cost for Italy is approximately €12 million in the next 5 years (current market share scenario for year 0: 80% hydrophilic catheters and 20% uncoated catheters). CONCLUSIONS: Considered over a lifetime, hydrophilic coated catheters are potentially a cost-effective choice in comparison to uncoated ones. These findings can assist policymakers in evaluating intermittent catheterisation in patients with spinal cord injury.

Clean intermittent catheterization revisited.

Catheterization is the insertion of a hollow flexible tube (called a catheter) to drain the urine from the bladder and is probably one of the oldest urologic procedures, dating back 3000 years. Since 1972, when urologist Dr Jack Lapides described a procedure for performing clean intermittent catheterization, this method of bladder management has become lifesaving for an individual who cannot empty their bladder independently. If the bladder is not emptied regularly, elevated storage pressures can develop which may put the upper tracts at risk of subsequent deterioration. Intermittent catheterization (IC) has become the first-line and preferred method of drainage in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, as long as dexterity or available caregiver support and body habitus allow access. However, over the past 20 years, an evolution has occurred in the technology of catheters used for IC. But with these advances, so has controversy arisen. This article is a review of the current application of IC, the current technology in catheter material and systems, differences between reusable and one-time, or single-use catheters, the cost benefit of doing IC, and the infectious benefit.

[A study of the goods supply system from hospital to outpatients with intermittent self-catheterization(ISC)].

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the current status of goods supplied by medical facilities to outpatients practicing ISC. METHODS: The status of goods supplied was investigated by interviewing 4 medical facilities and 26 outpatients practicing ISC, using a questionnaire. RESULTS: 1. Of all goods supplied for use by outpatients practicing ISC, 53. 0%were supplied by medical facilities. The outpatients bought some goods required for ISC by himself. Moreover, some goods were supplied by prescription. 2. When a hospital was consulted, while there were those to whom goods are not supplied from a hospital, there were those to whom much kinds and quantity are supplied from the hospital. As for the patient to whom many kinds and the goods of quantity are supplied, goods expense formed about 70% of ISC administration fee. DISCUSSION: In order to establish goods feed system, it was necessary to examine a common knowledge of the structure of goods supply to doctors or nurses and the validity of the ISC administration fee system from now on.

RCT of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of intermittent urethral catheterization with indwelling suprapubic catheterization in women undergoing surgery for urodynamic stress incontinence or uterovaginal prolapse. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral urogynaecology unit. POPULATION: Women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Women were randomized into one of two groups. Group 1 had bladder drainage using a suprapubic catheter inserted in theatre. The catheter was left on free drainage for 48 hours post-operatively before clamping. Group 2 was catheterized intermittently post-operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of post-operative hospital stay: time to resume normal voiding (defined as voided volumes greater than 200 mls and residual urine volumes less than 100 mls on three occasions); number of urinary tract infections (UTIs); catheterization costs; patient experience (determined from questionnaire); and a pain score. RESULTS: 75 women were randomized; 38 to suprapubic catheterization; 37 to intermittent catheterization. Three were withdrawn from study, leaving 36 women in each group. Groups were closely matched for age and type of surgery undertaken. Length of hospital stay and total duration of catheterization were both significantly shorter for the intermittent catheterization group; although there was no difference in the rate of UTI between the two groups. There was no clear patient preference for a specific catheterization method. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intermittent catheterization following urogynaecological surgery is associated with a more rapid return to normal micturition and a shorter hospital stay, although the clinical significance of the difference is perhaps limited.